Les pratiques pédagogiques d’éducateurs physiques du primaire en éducation à la santé
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude vise à examiner les pratiques pédagogiques d’éducateurs physiques afin de mieux comprendre comment s’opérationnalise l’inclusion de l’éducation à la santé en éducation physique. La méthodologie relève de l’étude de cas multiples faisant référence à 10 enseignants et combinant plusieurs méthodes de cueillette de données pour chacun des cas, à savoir un questionnaire auto-administré, de l’observation en différé et une entrevue semi-dirigée. L’examen des caractéristiques des pratiques pédagogiques des enseignants révèle qu’elles constituent une juxtaposition entre le champ disciplinaire de l’éducation à la santé et celui de l’éducation physique, plutôt qu’un véritable processus d’intégration des cadres théoriques et des pratiques propres à l’éducation à la santé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".