Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article envisage la citoyenneté dans le cadre des mutations actuelles des procès d’institutionnalisation économique, politique etculturel et de la transformation du sujet politique. Nous nous intéressons à l’émergence du phénomène d’incorporation de la citoyennetéen tant qu’il participe à la redéfinition du rapport de l’acteur à la communauté politique. L’analyse des transformationsactuelles de la citoyenneté est ainsi renvoyée à celle des mutations des rapports entre le droit et la démocratie, le législatif et lejudiciaire, le citoyen et la nation. Après avoir considéré la modernité du point de vue du rapport privilégié qu’elle instaure entrela citoyenneté et la nation et étudié les diverses dimensions du procès d’institutionnalisation politique de la société moderne, nousanalysons systématiquement les transformations des formes de l’État et de la citoyenneté. Nous analysons de manière systématiqueles mutations de l’institutionnalisation économique et culturelle en portant une attention particulière au double phénomène del’autonomisation de la corporation transnationale et de l’incorporation de la citoyenneté culturelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".