MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170112381 · doi:10.1109/61.915491

Salt fog testing of polymer housed surge arresters

2001· article· en· W2170112381 on OpenAlexaff
E.A. Cherney, B. Biglar, Shesha Jayaram

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurge arresterSurgeEnvironmental scienceEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the evaluation of the insulation design of polymer housed surge arresters for distribution lines. Five commercial designs were tested in a salt fog chamber for 9 cycles using a cycle consisting of 120 hours of salt fog that was followed by a 48 hour rest period for a total of 1280 hours of salt fog. In these tests, the specification for the 1000-hour salt fog test in IEC 1109 for composite insulators was used as a guide. The results demonstrate that a comprehensive evaluation of the external and internal insulation design of polymer housed surge arresters can be obtained by performing a salt fog test, and as such, the test can be considered as a useful design test. Suggestions for improvements in the insulation design of all polymer housed surge arresters evaluated are given in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207