Electrospray ionization mass spectra of acyl carrier protein are insensitive to its solution phase conformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) can be used to monitor conformational changes of proteins in solution based on the charge state distribution (CSD) of the corresponding gas-phase ions, although relatively few studies of acidic proteins have been reported. Here, we have compared the CSD and solution structure of recombinant Vibrio harveyi acyl carrier protein (rACP), a small acidic protein whose secondary and tertiary structure can be manipulated by pH, fatty acylation, and site-directed mutagenesis. Circular dichroism and intrinsic fluorescence demonstrated that apo-rACP adopts a folded helical conformation in aqueous solution below pH 6 or in 50% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid, but is unfolded at neutral and basic pH values. A rACP mutant, in which seven conserved acidic residues were replaced with their corresponding neutral amides, was folded over the entire pH range of 5 to 9. However, under the same solvent conditions, both wild type and mutant ACPs exhibited similar CSDs (6(+)-9(+) species) at all pH values. Covalent attachment of myristic acid to the phosphopantetheine prosthetic group of rACP, which is known to stabilize a folded conformation in solution, also had little influence on its CSD in either positive or negative ion modes. Overall, our results are consistent with ACP as a "natively unfolded" protein in a dynamic conformational equilibrium, which allows access to (de)protonation events during the electrospray process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".