Data Similarity-Aware Computation Infrastructure for the Cloud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cloud is emerging for scalable and efficient cloud services. To meet the needs of handling massive data and decreasing data migration, the computation infrastructure requires efficient data placement and proper management for cached data. In this paper, we propose an efficient and cost-effective multilevel caching scheme, called MERCURY, as computation infrastructure of the cloud. The idea behind MERCURY is to explore and exploit data similarity and support efficient data placement. To accurately and efficiently capture the data similarity, we leverage a low-complexity locality-sensitive hashing (LSH). In our design, in addition to the problem of space inefficiency, we identify that a conventional LSH scheme also suffers from the problem of homogeneous data placement. To address these two problems, we design a novel multicore-enabled locality-sensitive hashing (MC-LSH) that accurately captures the differentiated similarity across data. The similarity-aware MERCURY, hence, partitions data into the L1 cache, L2 cache, and main memory based on their distinct localities, which help optimize cache utilization and minimize the pollution in the last-level cache. Besides extensive evaluation through simulations, we also implemented MERCURY in a system. Experimental results based on real-world applications and data sets demonstrate the efficiency and efficacy of our proposed schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".