MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170150037 · doi:10.1080/08841230802178854

The Real World of the Ivory Tower: Linking Classroom and Practice via Pedagogical Modeling

2008· article· en· W2170150037 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Teaching in Social Work · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Work Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia HospitalDartmouth General HospitalDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIvory towerSocial workPedagogySocial justiceSociologyPsychologyMathematics educationEngineering ethicsSocial scienceEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The authors explore the pedagogical principles of congruency, modeling, and transfer of learning through the description and analysis of a course entitled “The Theory and Practice of Anti-oppressive Social Work.” Initially reviewing the literature related to the above concepts, they describe an instructor's attempt to explicitly model, via a range of pedagogical practices, the principles of social justice social work practice. Research was undertaken to analyze the effectiveness of this pedagogical modeling and to forefront the voices of the students in the course. The results challenge some of the accepted knowledge concerning modeling and transfer of learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it