MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170165927 · doi:10.1093/petrology/egs009

Partial Melting in the Higher Himalayan Crystallines of Eastern Nepal: the Effect of Decompression and Implications for the ‘Channel Flow’ Model

2012· article· en· W2170165927 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petrology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDecompressionFlow (mathematics)Partial meltingChannel (broadcasting)GeochemistryGeomorphologyMechanicsMantle (geology)ThermodynamicsPhysicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partial melting of deep continental crust may occur during either prograde heating or decompression. Although the effect of temperature on crustal melting has been widely investigated, few experimental studies have addressed the question of the influence of pressure on crustal anatexis. To understand the influence of decreasing pressure on partial melting processes, the thermodynamic approach of isochemical phase diagrams has been applied to garnet–K-feldspar–kyanite–sillimanite anatectic gneisses (Barun Gneiss) from the Higher Himalayan Crystallines (HHC) of eastern Nepal. The main melt-producing reactions, the amount of melt produced during heating vs decompression, and the effects of melt loss on the mineral assemblages and compositions have been investigated along four ideal P–T trajectories, dominated by either heating or decompression. Based on these results, the observed microstructures and mineral compositions of the Barun Gneiss have been interpreted in terms of melt-producing vs melt-consuming reactions (e.g. growth of peritectic garnet with preserved ‘nanogranite’ inclusions vs microstructures related to back-reactions between solids and melt), and used to derive the metamorphic evolution of the studied samples. The P–T pseudosection modelling predicts that at least 15–20 vol. % of melt was produced at peak P–T conditions through dehydration melting of both muscovite and biotite, and that melt production was mainly triggered by heating, with or without the combined effect of decompression. The preserved granulitic peak metamorphic assemblage, however, is consistent with a significant loss of most of this melt. The P–T evolution inferred for samples from different, strategically located, structural levels of the Barun Gneiss is consistent with the expectations of a ‘channel flow’ model, including: (1) the clockwise shape of the P–T paths; (2) the estimated P at peak T (new data: 10–8 kbar at 800°C; model: 13–7 kbar at 800°C); (3) the decreasing P structurally upward, which defines a ‘normal’ metamorphic sequence, in contrast to the inverted metamorphic sequence occurring in the lowermost Main Central Thrust Zone; (4) the nearly isothermal exhumation of the structurally lowest sample, reflecting the progressive exhumation of rocks that have been entrained in the deep, high-T region of the channel, versus the nearly isobaric heating of the structurally uppermost sample, reflecting the evolution of those rocks that flowed outwards with the underlying channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it