MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170180107 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.10177

The purple urine bag syndrome: a visually striking side effect of a highly alkaline urinary tract infection

2011· article· en· W2170180107 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
P. Peters, Jessica Merlo, Nicholas Beech, Chantelle Giles, Bonita Boon, Brian M. Parker, Craig Dancer, Wendy Munckhof, Hsuan-Ta Teng

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMethemoglobinemia and Tumor Lysis Syndrome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrinary systemUrineMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purple urine bag is a visually striking and rarely seen side effect of a urinary tract infection. The change in colour is purely within the bag itself; interestingly, the urine itself remains unchanged in colour. Our patient, an 82-year-old female, had a long-standing supra pubic catheter (SPC) in situ; she presented for her routine 6-week SPC change. During this visit, the colour change of the urine drainage bag was noted. The change in colour was consistent throughout the bag and extended to the urinary catheter, although not in the same shade of deep purple noted in the drainage bag (Fig. 1). The urine from the bag contained sediment which was sent for analysis. Fig. 1. The urine bag still attached to the removed supra pubic catheter. Colour change in consistent throughout the bag and extends (red in colour) into the catheter. The urine contained within the purple drainage bag was not purple on visual examination (Fig. 2), although the urine collected following the re-insertion of a new SPC was noticeably lighter in colour. There was no hindrance to the removal of the old SPC, although the patient complained of mild discomfort upon removal. The new SPC was inserted without difficulty. Our patient denied any recent history of nausea, fevers, sweats, chills or vomiting. The patient also denied any recent changes to her medication regimen or unusual dietary changes. Fig. 2. Urine collected from the purple urine bag. The urine itself was dark in colour but not purple in colour. Urinary dipstick analysis indicated the presence of large leucocytes, positive nitrates and a pH of 8.5. Following consultation with our hospitals infectious diseases team, the patient started on a course of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 875/125 mg BD for 5 days, while urine microscopy/culture/sensitivity (M/C/S) was conducted. Culture revealed the presence of Proteus mirabilis, sensitive to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Microscopy revealed the presence of phosphate crystals within the sediment from the purple urine bag (Fig. 3), while a smaller volume of phosphate crystals were noted in the second batch of urine from the fresh catheter/collection bag. The presence of phosphate crystals is a known side effect of a Proteus mirabilis infection. Fig. 3. Microscopy of the sediment collected from the urine sample within the purple urine bag, power of 10, indicating phosphate crystals. Based upon the patient’s history and the microbiology results, a diagnosis of purple urine bag syndrome was made. This is a rarely reported state where the urine collection bag is noted to change to purple. The condition is most common in patients with permanent urinary catheterization, either urethral or supra pubic, in combination with a highly alkaline urinary tract infection (UTI). Numerous organisms have been reported as being responsible for the purple urine bag and include Providencia bacteria, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis or Klebsiella pneumonie.1,2 The pathogenesis of purple urine bag syndrome is due to the metabolism of tryptophan by bacteria to indole and later converted to indicant in the liver.3 This is excreted and broken down in the urine by bacteria possessing one or both enzymes, sulphatise and phosphatase that metabolize this pigment to indirubin and indigo in an alkaline environment (urine). The exact cause of the colour change in purple urine bag syndrome is still unclear. Dealler and colleagues suggest it is due to tryptophan being metabolized to indole which is absorbed into the portal system and converted to indicant by the liver.1,3 This, in turn, is excreted into the urine where the presence of an alkaline environment and bacteria are capable of metabolizing indicant to indirubin and indigo.1,3 The indigo can also be present in the catheter itself, giving a blue discolouration.4 While purple urine bag syndrome may seem harmless, the underlying UTI can lead to serious consequences in a patient with a long-term urinary catheter in which the standard warning signs of dysuria may not be apparent on top of other medical comorbidities. Medical management of purple urine bag syndrome does not require any special treatment apart from changing the catheter and administering appropriate antimicrobial therapy to treat the underlying bacterial infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicMethemoglobinemia and Tumor Lysis SyndromeFrench-language works237,207