Origin of Late Pleistocene Bryozoan Reef Mounds; Great Australian Bight
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Bryozoan-rich biogenic mounds grew periodically on the prograding carbonate slope of the central Great Australian Bight throughout Pliocene-Pleistocene time. Cores from three ODP Leg 182 drill sites provide a record of mound growth during the last 300,000 years over a stratigraphic thickness of ∼ 150 m. These mounds, the first such structures described from the modern ocean, grew between paleodepths of 100 and 240 m; we infer that the upper limit of growth was established by swell wave base, and the lower boundary was fixed by an oligotrophic water mass. Detailed chronostratigraphy, based on radiometric and U-series dating, benthic foraminifer stable-isotope stratigraphy, and planktonic foraminifer abundance ratios, confirms that buildups flourished during glacial lowstands (even-numbered marine isotope stages) but were largely moribund during interglacial highstands and are not extant today. Mound floatstones are compositionally a mixture of in situ bryozoans comprising 96 genera and characterized by fenestrate, flat robust branching, encrusting, nodular-arborescent, and delicate branching growth forms. The packstone matrix comprises autochthonous and allochthonous sand-size bryozoans, benthic and planktonic foraminifers, serpulids, coralline algae, sponge spicules, peloids, and variable glauconite and quartz grains, together with mud-size ostracods, tunicate spicules, bioeroded sponge chips, and coccoliths. Intermound, allochthonous packstone and local grainstone contain similar particles, but they are conspicuously worn, abraded, blackened, and bioeroded. An integrated model of mound accretion during sea-level lowstands begins with delicate branching bryozoan floatstone that increases in bryozoan abundance and diversity upward over a thickness of 5-10 m, culminating in thin intervals of grainstone characterized by reduced diversity and locally abraded fossils. Mound accumulation was relatively rapid (30-67 cm/ky) and locally punctuated by rudstones and firmgrounds. Intermound highstand deposition was comparatively slow (17-25 cm/ky) and typified by meter-scale, fining-upward packages of packstone and grainstone or burrowed packstone, with local firmgrounds overlain by characteristically abraded particles. Mound growth during glacial periods is interpreted to have resulted from increased nutrient supply and enhanced primary productivity. Such elevated trophic resources were both regional and local, and thought to be focused in this area by cessation of Leeuwin Current flow, together with northward movement of the subtropical convergence and related dynamic mixing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".