MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170226056 · doi:10.1080/1226508x.2013.860708

BASEL III Counterparty Risk and Credit Value Adjustment: Impact of the Wrong-way Risk

2013· article· en· W2170226056 on OpenAlexaff
Jaesun Noh

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Economic Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCredit Risk and Financial Regulations
Canadian institutionsCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCredit riskBasel IIICredit valuation adjustmentBasel IICapital requirementFinancial systemCounterpartyEconomicsValuation (finance)Operational riskRisk-weighted assetCredit ratingBusinessMonetary economicsActuarial scienceRisk managementCredit referenceFinanceFinancial capitalCapital formation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the financial crisis of 2007 through 2010, BIS estimated that two-thirds of the loss of the financial institutions was due to credit valuation adjustment (CVA). The CVA is the marked-to-market price of credit products which involve counterparties. Hence, in BASEL III, banks are required to capture and allocate CVA capital and wrong-way risk (WWR). In this paper, we show that BASEL III CVA capital charge increases as the credit rating of the counterparty deteriorates. We also show that the extreme WWR can increase the BASEL III CVA charge by 30 times in Davis and Pistorius model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Economic ReviewSame topicCredit Risk and Financial RegulationsFrench-language works237,207