MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170230760 · doi:10.1109/aiccsa.2006.205099

Accurate Total Static Leakage Current Estimation in Transistor Stacks

2006· article· en· W2170230760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, 2006. · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubthreshold conductionLeakage (economics)NMOS logicTransistorScalingSpiceMOSFETLogic gateElectronic engineeringVoltageComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a simple model for the estimation of static leakage current in NMOS transistor stacks is introduced. The three leakage mechanisms addressed are subthreshold leakage, gate-tunneling and gate induced drain leakage (GIDL). The algorithmic description of the model can be broken down into three phases i) pre-extraction , ii) estimation and iii) width scaling. In the pre-extraction phase, data necessary for subthreshold leakage estimation is extracted a priori. This also involves characterizing voltages required for a specific set of input vector scenarios (exception vectors/voltages). In the estimation phase, unit width GIDL and gate tunneling are estimated deterministically while subthreshold leakage is estimated using the pre-extracted data. Finally, in the width scaling phase each leakage component is then width scaled and summed, to give the total static leakage exhibited by the stack. The proposed model was scripted in MatLab and compared with SPICE simulations for various scenarios. The average total error for each scenario was under 3%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it