MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170269585 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m100770200

Optimal Design Features of Camelized Human Single-domain Antibody Libraries

2001· article· en· W2170269585 on OpenAlexaff
Jamshid Tanha, Ping Xu, Zhigang Chen, Feng Ni, Howard A. Kaplan, Saran A. Narang, C. Roger MacKenzie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsViventia Bio (Canada)Biotechnology Research InstituteInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDomain (mathematical analysis)Computational biologyBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have constructed a human V(H) library based on a camelized V(H) sequence. The library was constructed with complete randomization of 19 of the 23 CDR3 residues and was panned against two monoclonal antibody targets to generate V(H) sequences for determination of the antigen contact residue positions. Furthermore, the feasibility and desirability of introducing a disulfide bridge between CDR1 and CDR3 was investigated. Sequences derived from the library showed a bias toward the use of C-terminal CDR3 residues as antigen contact residues. Mass spectrometric analyses indicated that CDR1-CDR3 disulfide formation was universal. However, surface plasmon resonance and NMR data showed that the CDR3 constraint imposed by the disulfide bridge was not always desirable. Very high yields of soluble protein products and lack of protein aggregation, as demonstrated by the quality of the (1)H-(15)N HSQC spectra, indicated that the V(H) sequence for library construction was a good choice. These results should be useful in the design of V(H) libraries with optimal features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207