MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170278410 · doi:10.1139/v04-021

Electrochemical behaviour of 1-{[(3-halophenyl)imino]methyl}-2-naphthol Schiff bases on graphite electrodes

2004· article· en· W2170278410 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kamran Polat, Mustafa Uçar, Mehmet Levent Aksu, Hüseyin Ünver

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAnkara Universitesi
KeywordsChemistryCoulometryChronoamperometryCyclic voltammetryElectrolysisBulk electrolysisElectrochemistryInorganic chemistrySupporting electrolyteElectrodeElectrolyteAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Organic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An electrochemical study of the reduction of 1-{[(3-halophenyl)imino]methyl}-2-naphthol compounds on graphite electrodes was carried out. All the compounds were dissolved in a 1:4 (volume fraction) mixture of tetrahydrofuran (THF) and methanol. NaClO 4 (0.1 mol L –1 ) was used as the supporting electrolyte. Cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry, constant-potential coulometry (bulk electrolysis), and constant-potential preparative electrolysis were employed. The cyclic voltammetric data revealed that the reduction on graphite was irreversible and followed an EC mechanism. The diffusion coefficients and the number of electrons transferred were determined using the chronoamperometric Cottrell slope and the ultramicro electrode steady-state current. The number of electrons was also determined by bulk electrolysis. The products of the electroreduction were synthesized in milligram quantities by the use of constant-potential preparative electrolysis. These products were purified and characterized by spectroscopic methods. Based on these findings, a mechanism for the electroreduction process is proposed.Key words: electrochemical reduction, hydroxynaphthylideneaniline Schiff bases, cyclic voltammetry, ultramicro electrode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207