MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170290975 · doi:10.1029/2003jb002589

Decay‐rate dependence of anhysteretic remanence: Fundamental origin and paleomagnetic applications

2003· article· en· W2170290975 on OpenAlexaff
Yongjae Yu, David J. Dunlop

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermoremanent magnetizationRemanenceDemagnetizing fieldCoercivityCondensed matter physicsExponential decayIntensity (physics)Single domainMagnetiteMagnetizationMaterials scienceMagnetic domainPhysicsMagnetic fieldOpticsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have measured the intensity of anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM) as a function of alternating field (AF) decay rate. For synthetic and natural single‐domain (SD) and pseudo‐single‐domain (PSD) magnetites, ARM intensity increases as decay rate decreases. Multidomain (MD) magnetites have the opposite response, ARM increasing as the decay rate increases. These are identical to the SD/PSD and MD dependences of thermoremanent magnetization on cooling rate. For all grain sizes and domain structures, ARM intensity increases as the AF decay rate used to achieve an initial demagnetized state decreases. Decay‐rate differences in ARM intensity are a property of low‐ and medium‐coercivity grains, as shown by annealing and by stepwise AF demagnetizing samples. We interpret the SD results to mean that increased AF exposure time permits a closer approach to equilibrium magnetization. An approximate thermal activation theory based on Néel [1949] and an exact theory by Egli and Lowrie [2002] predict 6–11% increases in ARM for an order of magnitude decrease in decay rate, in reasonable accord with the observed 12% increase for 0.065 μm SD grains. For MD grains, we hypothesize that increased exposure time (slower decay) permits more efficient self‐demagnetization, reducing ARM. Low‐coercivity grains experience the largest self‐demagnetizing fields and therefore have the largest decay‐rate response. Initial‐state decay‐rate response is attributed to longer exposure times leaving domain walls more strongly pinned in deeper potential wells (the net self‐demagnetizing field is zero in the demagnetized state). Acquisition decay‐rate, annealing, and initial‐state responses of PSD grains are a blend of SD and MD responses. Because ARM is the most frequently used normalizer in relative paleointensity determination, it is important either to use a standard decay rate or else to remove the decay‐rate dependence by demagnetizing the ARM to ∼30% of its initial value (ARM 0.3 ). A standard demagnetization level for the normalizing ARM is particularly important when comparing paleointensity records from different laboratories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207