Study of holocene landslide deposits by comparison of GPR, refraction seismic and electrical resistivity data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper integrates the results of a geophysical investigation of Holocene landslide events in the Cypress Hills, Canada. Ground penetrating radar (GPR), P-wave refraction seismic and electrical resistivity imaging were used to delineate the boundaries of the landslide masses. GPR provided information about the first meters of the subsurface. The seismic refraction survey complemented the datasets provided by GPR, giving results from greater depths. The electrical resistivity method, in principle the most indicated technique for such clay rich deposits, was used to provide a general structure of the upper 30 meters. Results from two locations provide an overall image of the structure and information about the vertical extent of the landslide. Two different interfaces, that probably mark the top :and the bottom of the landslide, are depicted. In connection with these boundaries, the thickness of the landslide deposits is estimated to increase roughly from 10-15 to more than 20 meters towards the toe of the landslide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it