Les mouvements sociaux et le système politique : quelques remarques sur les limites de l’approche du processus politique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cette contribution au débat lancé par les éditeurs de ce numéro spécial, j’aimerais clarifier les limites de l’approche du processus politique et en discuter les conséquences. De mon point de vue, qui est celui d’un représentant de cette approche, ses limites sont souvent exagérées et ne concernent en tout cas pas la question du changement systémique. En tant que représentant de cette approche, j’aimerais proposer quelques modifications aux concepts incriminés à juste titre par les éditeurs, afin de les rendre plus aptes à tenir compte des tendances fondamentales dans le domaine de la contestation politique dans la société contemporaine. Pour conclure, j’aimerais souligner que cette approche n’a pas que des limites, mais qu’elle permet d’ouvrir des portes, de jeter des ponts et de créer des synergies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.020 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".