Compatibilization efficiency in post‐consumer recycled polyethylene/polypropylene blends: Effect of contamination
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work investigates the effect of ethylene–octene copolymer (EOC) as a compatibilizer for two virgin and two recycled polyethylene/polypropylene blends. In particular, a focus is made on the interfering effects of contamination in recycled materials. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) shows that (i) recycled compounds have smaller domain sizes than virgin compounds, and (ii) addition of a compatibilizer is much more effective on domain sizes reduction in virgin compounds than in recycled ones. Conversely, transmission electron microscopy, coupled with energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy, shows the presence of nano‐size contaminants in both recycled blends. Such contaminants are considered responsible for the above mentioned observations in SEM. Mechanical characterizations are also in good agreement with morphological observations. Although recycled compounds containing EOC show improved deformability, the ultimate deformation of virgin compounds is much higher. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 55:2368–2376, 2015. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it