MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170389484 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.162301

Double-Hadron Leptoproduction in the Nuclear Medium

2006· article· en· W2170389484 on OpenAlexaff
A. Airapetian, Н. Акопов, Z. Akopov, M. Amarian, A. Andrus, E. C. Aschenauer, W. Augustyniak, R. Avakian, A. Avetissian, E. Avetissian, P. Bailey, S. Belostotski, N. Bianchi, H. P. Blok, H. Böttcher, A. Borissov, A. Borysenko, A. Brüll, V. Bryzgalov, M. Capiluppi, G. P. Capitani, G. Ciullo, M. Contalbrigo, P.F. Dalpiaz, W. Deconinck, R. De Leo, M. Demey, L. De Nardo, E. De Sanctis, E. Devitsin, M. Diefenthaler, P. Di Nezza, J. Dreschler, M. Düren, M. Ehrenfried, A. Elalaoui-Moulay, G. Elbakian, F. Ellinghaus, U. Elschenbroich, R. Fabbri, A. Fantoni, L. Felawka, S. Frullani, A. Funel, G. Gapienko, В. А. Гапиенко, F. Garibaldi, K. Garrow, G. Gavrilov, V. Gharibyan, F. Giordano, O. Grebeniouk, I. M. Gregor, K. A. Griffioen, H. Guler, C. Hadjidakis, M. Hartig, D. Hasch, T. Hasegawa, W.H.A. Hesselink, A. Hillenbrand, M. Hoek, Y. Holler, B. Hommez, I. Hristova, G. Iarygin, A. Ivanilov, A. Izotov, H. E. Jackson, A. Jgoun, R. Kaiser, T. Keri, E. Kinney, A. Kisselev, T. Kobayashi, M. Kopytin, В. А. Коротков, В. Козлов, Bernhard Krauß, P. Kravchenko, V. G. Krivokhijine, L. Lagamba, L. Lapikás, P. Lenisa, P. Liebing, L. A. Linden-Levy, W. Lorenzon, J. Lu, S. Lu, B.-Q. Ma, B. Maiheu, N. C. R. Makins, Y. Mao, B. Mariański, H. Marukyan, F. Masoli, V. Mexner, N. Meyners, T. Michler, O. Mikloukho, C. A. Miller, Y. Miyachi, V. Muccifora, M. Murray, А. Нагайцев, E. Nappi, Y. Naryshkin, M. Negodaev, W.‐D. Nowak, H. Ohsuga, A. Osborne, R. Pérez-Benito, N. Pickert, M. Raithel, D. Reggiani, P. E. Reimer, A. Reischl, A. R. Roelon, K. Rith, G. Rosner, A. Rostomyan, L. Rubáček, J. G. Rubin, D. Ryckbosch, Y. Salomatin, I. Sanjiev, I. Savin, A. Schäfer, G. Schnell, K. P. Schüler, J. Seele, R. Seidl, B. Seitz, C. Shearer, T.-A. Shibata, V. Shutov, K. Sinram, M. Stancari, M. Statera, E. Steffens, J. J. M. Steijger, H. Stenzel, J. Stewart, F. Stinzing, J. Streit, P. Tait, Hiroki Tanaka, S. Taroian, B. Tchuiko, A. Terkulov, A. Trzciński, M. Tytgat, A. Vandenbroucke, P. B. van der Nat, G. van der Steenhoven, Y. Van Haarlem, D. Veretennikov, V. Vikhrov, Christian Vogel, S. Wang, Y. Ye, Z. Ye, S. Yen, B. Zihlmann, P. Żuprański

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron
KeywordsPhysicsNuclear physicsHadronDESYHadronizationXenonKryptonScatteringParticle physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first measurements of double-hadron production in deep-inelastic scattering within the nuclear medium were made with the HERMES spectrometer at DESY HERA using a 27.6 GeV positron beam. By comparing data for deuterium, nitrogen, krypton, and xenon nuclei, the influence of the nuclear medium on the ratio of double-hadron to single-hadron yields was investigated. Nuclear effects on the additional hadron are clearly observed, but with little or no difference among nitrogen, krypton, or xenon, and with smaller magnitude than effects seen on previously measured single-hadron multiplicities. The data are compared with models based on partonic energy loss or prehadronic scattering and with a model based on a purely absorptive treatment of the final-state interactions. Thus, the double-hadron ratio provides an additional tool for studying modifications of hadronization in nuclear matter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207