MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170391893 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01094.2010

Atrial tachycardia/fibrillation in the connexin 43 G60S mutant (Oculodentodigital dysplasia) mouse

2011· article· en· W2170391893 on OpenAlexafffund
Jari M. Tuomi, Karel Tyml, Douglas L. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research Institute
FundersHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsConnexinAtrial fibrillationInternal medicineSinus tachycardiaSinus rhythmMedicineElectrophysiologyGap junctionCarbacholOrthodromicCardiologyEndocrinologyIntracardiac injectionAtrial tachycardiaChemistryStimulationCatheter ablation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in general practice, can be promoted by conduction slowing. Cardiac impulse conduction depends on gap junction channels, which are composed of connexins (Cxs). While atrial Cx40 and Cx43 are equally expressed, AF studies have primarily focused on Cx40 reductions. The G60S Cx43 mutant (Cx43(G60S/+)) mouse model of Oculodentodigital dysplasia has a 60% reduction in Cx43 in the atria. Cx43(G60S/+) mice were compared with Cx40-deficient (Cx40(-/-)) mice to determine the role of Cxs in atrial tachycardia/fibrillation (AT/F). Intracardiac electrophysiological studies were done in 6-mo-old male C57BL/6 Cx43(G60S/+) mutant, littermate (Cx43(+/+)), Cx40(-/-), and C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) mice. AT/F induction used an extra stimulus during sinus rhythm, programmed electrical stimulation, or burst pacing (1-ms pulses, 50-Hz, 400-ms train) in the absence and presence of carbachol (CCh). Atrial effective refractory periods did not differ between strains. Cx43(G60S/+) mice were more susceptible to induction of sustained AT/F (duration >2 min, 9 of 12; maximum >35 min) compared with Cx43(+/+) mice (3 of 11; χ(2) = 5.24; P = 0.02). CCh enhanced sustained AT/F susceptibility in WT (from 1 of 12 without, to 7 of 10 with CCh; χ(2) = 8.98; P < 0.01) but not in Cx40(-/-) mice (1 of 13 without vs. 2 of 9 with CCh; χ(2) = 0.95; P = NS). The pattern of epicardial recordings during AT/F in Cx43(G60S/+) mice was left preceding right, with left atrial fractionated activation patterns consistent with clinical observations of AF. In conclusions, while Cx43(G60S/+) mice had severe AT/F, Cx40(-/-) mice were resistant to CCh-induced AT/F.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207