MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170417270 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2009.5118308

Optimizing CMOS amplifier design directly in SPICE without the need for additional mathematical models

2009· article· en· W2170417270 on OpenAlexaff
Euisoo Yoo, Gordon W. Roberts

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiceElectronic engineeringAmplifierComputer scienceCMOSCadenceCurrent-feedback operational amplifierOperational amplifierElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a method that optimizes the performance of CMOS amplifiers with respect to gain, bandwidth, noise, distortion and power. The method is performed directly in SPICE without the aid of mathematical models or external software routines. The method works in all SPICE programs from Cadence to the student version of PSPICE. The technique is based on tuning the voltage of specific nodes of the amplifier using a servo-loop biasing technique in conjunction with a replica amplifier circuit to span the entire performance space with a resolution of choice. Both single-stage and multi-stage amplifiers are considered in this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207