MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170452593 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2004.841981

A Wideband Crosstalk Canceller for xDSL Using Common-Mode Information

2005· article· en· W2170452593 on OpenAlexaff
A. Homayoun Kamkar-Parsi, Martin Bouchard, G. Bessens, Tet Yeap

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital subscriber lineWidebandCommon-mode signalCrosstalkElectronic engineeringComputer scienceAsymmetric digital subscriber lineTelecommunicationsDigital signal processingEngineeringAnalog signal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter uses the twisted-pair common-mode signal as the input of an adaptive canceller to remove some wideband crosstalk in a digital subscriber line (xDSL) differential signal. Simulations using simple crosstalk and line balance models show the potential benefits of the canceller to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of an xDSL channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207