Late Quaternary stratigraphy, chronology, and depositional processes on the slope of S.E. Baffin Island, detrital carbonate and Heinrich events: Implications for onshore glacial history
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to describe ice sheet/ocean interactions at the NE margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet over 40 radiocarbon dates have been obtained on foraminifera from nine, 2.5 to 11 m piston cores from the slope of SE Baffin Island. The cores were collected off Cumberland Sound and north of Hudson Straitfrom 750 to 1 510 m waterdepth. Rates of sediment accumulation varied between 20 and 40 cm/ky. Six cores contain high-resolution records of events during Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 2 and parts of 1 and 3, whereas three cores have core top dates of ≥30 ka and thus provide information on MIS 3 and possibly 4/5. The cores include three main facies: Lithofacies A - yellowish/buff detrital carbonate-rich sediment, also referred to as Detrital Carbonate (DC-) events; Lithofacies B - olive-green detrital carbonate-poor sediment; and Lithofacies C - a black sedimentary unit. The lithofacies represent changes in glacial sources, ice sheet proximity, and processes of deposition. We conclude that there are DC- events correlative with Heinrich events H-1, H- 2, and H-4 in the North Atlantic; however, we find no compelling evidence for a DC-layer during H-3 (ca. 27 ± ka). There are three to four distinct DC- events after H-4 (ca.35 ± ka) but their exact ages are difficult to determine. Grain-size spectra and X-radiographs show that the DC-sediments are stratified to massive silty-clays with little sand, but generally have higher sand percentages at the base. DC-layers were deposited in part from turbidity currents, melting of icebergs, and rain-out of fine-grained silts and clays. In contrast, ice distal sediments in the eastern North Atlantic recorded H-events as an abrupt increase in ice rafted sand-size particles. In our study area, H-layer thicknesses vary from 0 and 70 cm for H-1 and 20 to 90 cm for H-2; H-4 is ≥60 to 100 cm thick. Over the total length of our records, the sedimentary conditions have been dominated by hemipelagic deposition (lithofacies B), implying that those times when ice reached the shelf (lithofacies A and C) have been short.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".