MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170476331

Using simulation and symbolic computing in linear programming

2006· article· en· W2170476331 on OpenAlexaff
Silviu Guiaşu

Bibliographic record

VenueSMO'06 Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Simulation, Modelling and Optimization · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear programmingLinear inequalityComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationInequality
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

N. Karmarkar ((1)) has shown how a linear program with inequality constraints may be transformed into a normed linear program with equality con- straints whose feasible solutions are probability distributions. In looking for the optimum of normed linear programs he used standard optimization techniques from multivariate calculus. The objective of this paper is to develop the proba- bilistic search for the optimum solution of a normed linear program, proposed in (2), using Pearson's ((3)) 2 -indicator and the symbolic computing. The approx-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSMO'06 Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Simulation, Modelling and OptimizationSame topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207