MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170559759 · doi:10.1016/j.crci.2011.06.002

Synthesis, crystal structures and thermal analysis of two new coordination polymers

2011· article· en· W2170559759 on OpenAlex
M.O. Awaleh, Idriss Guirreh Farah, E.S. Dirieh, Thierry Maris, Samatar Mohamed Bouh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Chimie · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermogravimetric analysisLigand (biochemistry)PolymerStoichiometryMetalChemistryCoordination polymerSingle crystalThermal analysisCoordination sphereCrystallographyCrystal structureStereochemistryPolymer chemistryCombinatorial chemistryThermalOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two new silver(I) – dithioether coordination polymers based on the combination of the dithioether ligand L = CH 3 –S(CH 2 ) 3 S–CH 3 and AgX silver salts, where X = NO 3 − (1) and CF 3 CF 2 COO − (2), have been synthesized and characterized. In both coordination polymers, the dithioether building blocks propagated the silver (I) centers to build chains, in which the counteranions complete the coordination sphere of the metal centers. Furthermore, the tubular chains in 2 are, in turn, associated through weak C F … F C interactions into 3D-structures. The thermogravimetric investigation reveals that those complexes decompose in a single step respectively to metallic silver. The stoichiometries of the obtained polymers were found to be dependent of the starting metal-to-ligand ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it