MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170565692 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2006.1696513

LS FFT-based channel estimators using pilot-embedded data-bearing approach in space-frequency coded MIMO-OFDM systems

2006· article· en· W2170565692 on OpenAlexaff
Chaiyod Pirak, Z.J. Wang, K.J.R. Liu, S. Jitapunkul

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingFast Fourier transformEstimatorMIMO-OFDMChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceMIMOAlgorithmElectronic engineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) is one prominent communication system for realizing high speed data transmission services. One critical issue for such systems is channel estimation. In this paper, we first develop a pilot-embedded data-bearing (PEDB) approach for joint channel estimation and data detection. Then we propose a least square (LS) FFT-based channel estimator by employing the concept of FFT-based channel estimation to improve the performance of the PEDB-LS channel estimation. Also, the effects of model mismatch error when considering non-integer multipath delay profiles, and its performance are investigated. We further propose an adaptive LS FFT-based channel estimator that employs the optimum number of significant taps. Simulation results reveal that the adaptive LS FFT-based estimator provides superior performance under quasi-static channels or low Doppler's shift regimes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207