MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170578619 · doi:10.1177/0734242x0202000208

Microbial reduction of amended sulfate in anaerobic mature fine tailings from oil sand

2002· article· en· W2170578619 on OpenAlexafffund
Myrna J. Salloum, M. J. Dudas, Phillip M. Fedorak

Bibliographic record

VenueWaste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersSyncrude
KeywordsTailingsSulfateSulfideEnvironmental chemistrySulfurChemistryThiosulfateNitrateGypsumHydrogen sulfideSulfate-reducing bacteriaMethanePyriteMineralogyMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bitumen extraction from oil sands has resulted in large tailings ponds, containing suspended material that requires over one hundred years to densify. The mature fine tailings (MFT) have become anaerobic and bubbles of gas are observed on the pond surface. Gypsum has been proposed as an additive to increase the rate of MFT consolidation. In a laboratory study, MFT was amended with sulfate and monitored. Pore water sulfate concentrations declined and bicarbonate concentration increased. Nitrate was depleted within 36 d and the levels of soluble iron remained below 0.8 mg L(-1). Thiosulfate and sulfide were detected only near the end of the experiment. Acid volatile sulfides (AVS) increased until day 39, and then reached a plateau. Methane was not detected throughout the incubation in samples amended with sulfate. The increase in AVS supports sulfide incorporation into the solid phase, however, the plateau after 39 d suggests a secondary fate of reduced sulfide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular EconomySame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207