Diffuse reflectance measurements using lensless CMOS imaging chip
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To assess superficial epithelial microcirculation, a diagnostic tool should be able to detect the heterogeneity of microvasculature, and to monitor qualitative derangement of perfusion in a diseased condition. Employing a lensless CMOS imaging chip with an RGB Bayer filter, experiments were conducted with a microfluidic platform to obtain diffuse reflectance maps. Haemoglobin (Hb) solution (160 g/l) was injected in the periodic channels (grooves) of the microfluidic phantom which were covered with ~250 μm thick layer of intralipid to obtain a diffusive environment. Image processing was performed on data acquired on the surface of the phantom to evaluate the diffuse reflectance from the subsurface periodic pattern. Thickness of the microfluidic grooves, the wavelength dependent contrast between Hb and the background, and effective periodicity of the grooves were evaluated. Results demonstrate that a lens-less CMOS camera is capable of capturing images of subsurface structures with large field of view.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".