MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170602304 · doi:10.1002/jcb.25215

In situ Analysis of Smoothelin‐like 1 and Calmodulin Interactions in Smooth Muscle Cells by Proximity Ligation

2015· article· en· W2170602304 on OpenAlexafffund
Annegret Ulke‐Lemée, Sara Turner, Justin A. MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCalmodulinProximity ligation assayIn situAmino acidCell biologyChemistryBiophysicsBiologyBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The smoothelin-like 1 (SMTNL1) protein is the newest member of the smoothelin family of muscle proteins. Two calmodulin (CaM)-binding domains (CBD1 for Ca-CaM; CBD2 for apo-CaM) have been described for the SMTNL1 protein using in vitro assays. We now demonstrate in situ associations of SMTNL1 and CaM in A7r5 smooth muscle cells using the proximity ligation assay (PLA). We quantified CaM-SMTNL1 proximity events accurately after taking into account variations in protein expression levels. The refined method allows quantification of in situ proximity after transient transfection with an associated error of <10%. The proximity of SMTNL1 and CaM in A7r5 cells could be reduced by scrambling the amino acid sequence and mutation of large hydrophobic amino acids of CBD1. The truncation of CBD2 did not influence SMTNL1 proximity to CaM. Ultimately, we conclude that SMTNL1 forms complex interactions with CaM in smooth muscle cells, with a role for CBD1 and possibly the intrinsically disordered region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207