A Self-Scheduling Model for NASA Swarm-Based Exploration Missions Using ASSL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents our research towards a self-scheduling mechanism for the NASA swarm-based exploration missions. By its virtue, ANTS (Autonomous Nano Technology Swarm) is considered to be an autonomic system with autonomic behavior that constitutes a self-scheduling mechanism, thus allowing task distribution on the fly with no human intervention. The goal of this work is to investigate a possible self-scheduling mechanism for ANTS, in accordance with the system and environmental conditions. In this paper, a formal task-scheduling approach is presented, and the ANTS self-scheduling behavior is modeled and specified with ASSL (Autonomic System Specification Language), where the group and individual tasks are structured in the fashion of TAFT (Time Aware Fault-Tolerant). TAFT is a recently devised approach that applies tolerance to timing violations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it