MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170628400 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4353343

Analysis of Cardiac Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Images Using Sparse Representation

2007· article· en· W2170628400 on OpenAlex
Lijun Bao, Yuemin Zhu, Wanyu Liu, M Robini, Zhaobang Pu, Isabelle Magnin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiffusion MRIHeaviside step functionSparse approximationRepresentation (politics)Tensor (intrinsic definition)Artificial intelligenceNoise reductionNoise (video)Magnetic resonance imagingPattern recognition (psychology)Structure tensorComputer scienceDiffusionSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Basis (linear algebra)AlgorithmMathematicsImage (mathematics)PhysicsMathematical analysisGeometryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cardiac diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DT-MRI), low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) inherently hampers the measurement accuracy of myocardium fiber structures. This paper presents a new method for filtering diffusion weighted (DW) images in cardiac DT-MRI. The method is based on sparse representation through using basis pursuit denoising (BPDN) algorithm allowing seeking overall sparest solution. It decomposes useful structures in DW images into sparsely representing atoms with Heaviside dictionary, while yielding nonsparse representation on noise, which leads to the separation of the noise from the image's useful structures. The proposed method is evaluated on both simulated and real cardiac DW images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it