MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170642954 · doi:10.1186/1710-1492-10-s2-a18

Treatment of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor related angioedema with icatibant

2014· article· en· W2170642954 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Peter P.K. Ho, Chrystyna Kalicinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueAllergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcatibantAngioedemaAngiotensin-converting enzymeBradykininPharmacologyMedicineHereditary angioedemaACE inhibitorChemistryInternal medicineDermatologyBlood pressureReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The absolute risk of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor angioedema is 0.3% [ 1 ]. The mechanism is felt to be accumulation of bradykinin. The current treatment is discontinuation of ACE-I inhibitor, and intubation if necessary. Icatibant is a bradykinin receptor antagonist, useful in treating hereditary angioedema [ 2 ]. We present a patient from a Canadian center who had ACE-inhibitor induced angioedema requiring intubation who did not respond to epinephrine or C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate, then later responded favorably to Icatibant. We present a case of a 76 year old male with hypertension, type II diabetes, no allergies, who was seen in the ER with acute new-onset tongue and facial swelling. He had a virus 2 weeks prior. His medications included quinapril, simvastatin, repaglinide, metformin, pioglitazone, and aspirin. He had a swollen tongue, oral cavity, neck and was unable to swallow. There was no urticaria. He was given diphenhydramine 50mg IV, methylprednisolone 125mg IV, epinephrine 0.3mg IM, and ranitidine 50mg IV. Swelling progressed and he was intubated. Over the next 24 hours, he received methylprednisolone 80mg every 8 hours, ranitidine 50mg every 8 hours, diphenhydramine 50mg every 6 hours, two doses of C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate, 1500 units IV followed by 1000 units. Quinipril was discontinued. Computed tomography of the neck showed no abscess. Over the next 2 days there was minimal improvement. Therefore, on hospital day 3, he received 3 doses of Icatibant 30 mg over 24 hours. Improvement was noted, and by the next day, he was extubated. Following overnight monitoring, he was transferred to the medicine ward. There was no recurrence and he was discharged. C1 esterase inhibitor level and function was normal (drawn prior to infusion). At his two month follow up he remained asymptomatic. ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers are avoided. He was diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome following work up for anemia noted on admission. There have been published reports outside of Canada describing the use of Icatibant in ACE-inhibitor induced angioedema [ 3 ]. Icatibant is not indicated in Canada for ACE-inhibitor induced angioedema. However, it may need to be considered in severe cases. Icatibant may be helpful in ACE-inhibitor induced angioedema when the patient has not responded to the discontinuation of the ACE inhibitor and alternative therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAllergy Asthma and Clinical ImmunologySame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207