MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170644657 · doi:10.1504/ijwet.2013.052582

Social network restructuring after a node removal

2013· article· en· W2170644657 on OpenAlexafffund
Rokia Missaoui, Elsa Negre, Dyah Anggraini, Jean Vaillancourt

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Web Engineering and Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBetweenness centralityCentralityComputer scienceNode (physics)ExploitClosenessNetwork controllabilitySocial network (sociolinguistics)WitnessTopology (electrical circuits)Computer networkComputer securityMathematicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central nodes (i.e., prominent actors) in a social network are those that are linked to other nodes in an extensive or critical manner. Therefore, their removal may lead to points of failure. The objective of the present work is to exploit network topology to devise an approach towards: 1 finding a substitute to a deleted node if the latter is a central one 2 adding appropriate links to maintain the network connected. The approach exploits the role played by nodes to predict the new structure of a social network once one entity disappears. The role of a node in the network is expressed in terms of its centrality in the network. Three important roles are considered: the leader, the mediator and the witness. An entity acts as a leader, a mediator or a witness if it has a high degree centrality, betweenness centrality and closeness centrality, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Web Engineering and TechnologySame topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207