MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170659260 · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12394

How do climate and topography influence the greening of the forest‐tundra ecotone in northern Québec? A dendrochronological analysis of<i>Betula glandulosa</i>

2015· article· en· W2170659260 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Pascale Ropars, Esther Lévesque, Stéphane Boudreau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité LavalCenter for Northern Studies
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsShrubTundraEcotonePrecipitationNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexGrowing seasonPhysical geographySubarctic climateEnvironmental scienceBorealDendroclimatologyGeographyEcologyEcosystemClimatologyClimate changeBiologyGeologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary NDVI analysis and repeated aerial photographs have revealed significant shrub expansion in many subarctic regions. While the recent increase in temperature is usually considered to be the main driver of this phenomenon at regional scales, very little is known about the local heterogeneity of shrub responses across the landscape. In this study, we aim to identify the climatic factors controlling the growth of the largely distributed shrub species B etula glandulosa in three types of environments (terrace, hilltop and snowbed). We also aim to evaluate the relationship between B . glandulosa growth and the NDVI data for the Boniface River region, in north‐western Québec, where the study took place. In the field, we harvested 180 B . glandulosa individuals (20 per site, 3 sites per type of environment). We constructed specific growth‐ring width chronologies and mean axial growth rate chronologies for each site and used them for dendroclimatic analysis (response functions). We also used linear regressions to evaluate the relative influence of dwarf birch growth on the NDVI trend. We found a sharp increase in B . glandulosa radial growth in the 1990s followed by a sharp decreasing trend from 2002 on terraces and hilltops, while growth remained high in snowbeds. B etula glandulosa growth was positively correlated with summer temperatures on terraces and hilltops, whereas winter precipitation promoted growth on snowbeds. The NDVI trend was largely correlated to B . glandulosa growth on terraces and hilltops for the period between 1986 and 2002 (71–80% explained variance). Synthesis . Our results suggest that topography plays a major role in B . glandulosa growth and therefore in shrub community dynamics. Because terraces and hilltops represent 70% of the land surface, the sharp B . glandulosa growth increase at these sites promoted an important overall expansion of the shrub community in the region. However, the decline in B . glandulosa growth observed after 2002 suggests that the expansion could be slowed down in the near future, therefore limiting shrub growth contribution to the regional NDVI signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EcologySame topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207