Partial and Opportunistic Relay Selection with Outdated Channel Estimates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the impact of using outdated channel estimates for relay selection and signal amplification on the performance of amplify-and-forward (AF) relays under partial relay selection (PRS) and opportunistic relay selection (ORS). In practice, outdated channel state information (CSI) can occur due to feedback or scheduling delay. Both variable gain (VG) AF and fixed gain AF schemes are considered. Outage probability, the average bit error rate (BER) and simplified high signal-to-noise ratio approximations are derived. The effect of parameters such as the number of relays, the rank of chosen relay, and the correlation between the delayed and current channel state information are analyzed. Outdated CSI for computing relay gains in PRS causes about 2 dB loss. In ORS, a 3% reduction in correlation causes up to an order of magnitude increase in the outage probability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it