Integration of phase equilibria modelling and garnet Sm-Nd chronology for construction of P-T-t paths: examples from the Cordilleran Coast Plutonic Complex, USA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Integration of petrographic observations, mineral chemistry, garnet Sm-Nd isochrons, and MnNaCaKFMASH pseudosection phase equilibria models constructed with THERMOCALC provides quantitative metamorphic pressure-temperature-time (P-T-t) paths which allow determination of assemblage/reaction history for pelites. Examples are presented for the Cretaceous to Tertiary magmatic arc of the North American Coast Plutonic Complex. Metamorphism in the western Coast Plutonic Complex of southeastern Alaska and in the North Cascades of Washington resulted from at least three widespread events from > 100 Ma to c. 60 Ma, and in both areas partly resulted from crustal thickening, evidenced by local occurrences of kyanite after andalusite. Pressure-temperature pseudosections constructed from bulk rock compositions and the intersection of garnet core composition isopleths provide estimates for the pressure and temperature of garnet core growth. Intersections of these isopleths indicate garnet growth 18 to 85 °C above the predicted garnet-in reaction temperatures. Rim and near-rim garnet compositions and matrix mineral chemistry provide estimates for near-peak metamorphic conditions. Finite pressure-temperature-time paths of garnet zone metamorphism were determined from the combined core growth and pressure-temperature conditions determined from near-rim garnet and matrix mineral compositions. The western Coast Plutonic Complex near the Stikine River, southeastern Alaska, displays a complex pattern of regional metamorphism overprinted by contact metamorphic aureoles. Many of the c. 90 Ma aureoles contain andalusite, andalusite plus sillimanite, or andalusite plus kyanite with complex replacement textures. A pseudosection constructed for a contact metamorphic rock on Kadin Island (95GL11c), predicts that garnet grew c. 555 ± 10 °C and 4.8 ± 0.7 kbar, above the garnet-in line and the aluminium silicate triple-point pressure. These results suggest that andalusite in samples from this aureole likely grew prior to garnet and that the pressure may have increased by ≤ 1 kbar during metamorphism. The southern part of the North Cascades in Washington also contain complex aluminium silicate replacement textures with early andalusite and later kyanite and sillimanite. A sample (96NC67), collected near the andalusite-bearing aureole of the Mt Stuart batholith, contains sillimanite and c. 10 mm garnet crystals containing staurolite inclusions in their cores. Temperatures estimated from the garnet core of this sample are within the pseudosection staurolite stability field, compatible with initial garnet growth significantly above the garnetin line. The garnet rim thermometry estimate of c. 668 ± 59 °C for this sample is c. 85 °C higher than the core growth temperature. The calculated P-T-t path provides important information for interpreting regional and contact metamorphism. An extensive region NE of the Mt Stuart batholith in the North Cascades underwent a significant pressure increase; however, the timing and nature of medium- to high-pressure metamorphism is controversial. Quantitative P-T-t paths constructed for garnet growth along the NE margin of the batholith indicate that 87-85 Ma garnet growth was younger than the nearby Mt Stuart batholith (93.5 ± 1.4 Ma, U-Pb zircon). Garnet core and rim segments are isochronous indicating a short interval for garnet growth. P-T-t paths indicate that garnet growth occurred in the sillimanite stability field during a maximum pressure increase of 1 to 2 kbar, after rocks passed through the andalusite stability field (Mt Stuart contact metamorphism). Careful sampling, hand-picking, acid leaching, and isotopic analysis of garnet provide geologically consistent ages with uncertainties of ≤ 1.0 Ma. Thermodynamic modelling in the MnNaCaKFMASH system provide reasonable P-T predictions for pelite mineral stability that can be integrated with isotope ages to provide quantitative P-T-t paths. The P-T-t paths developed for both regional and contact metamorphic rocks allow critical evaluation of tectonic models and of interpretations for mineral textures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".