MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170699196 · doi:10.1109/ipdps.2009.5161064

A partition-based approach to support streaming updates over persistent data in an active datawarehouse

2009· article· en· W2170699196 on OpenAlexaff
Abhirup Chakraborty, Ajit Singh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTupleComputer sciencePartition (number theory)Overhead (engineering)ExploitData warehouseData streamRelation (database)Join (topology)LocalityDistributed computingData miningParallel computingDatabaseOperating systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Active warehousing has emerged in order to meet the high user demands for fresh and up-to-date information. Online refreshment of the source updates introduces processing and disk overheads in the implementation of the warehouse transformations. This paper considers a frequently occurring operator in active warehousing which computes the join between a fast, time varying or bursty update stream S and a persistent disk relation R, using a limited memory. Such a join operation is the crux of a number of common transformations (e.g., surrogate key assignment, duplicate detection etc) in an active data warehouse. We propose a partition-based join algorithm that minimizes the processing overhead, disk overhead and the delay in output tuples. The proposed algorithm exploits the spatio-temporal locality within the update stream, and improves the delays in output tuples by exploiting hot-spots in the range or domain of the joining attributes, and at the same time shares the I/O cost of accessing disk data of relation R over a volume of tuples from update stream S. We present experimental results showing the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207