MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170700498 · doi:10.1109/16.974742

Preparation of thin-film transistors with chemical bath deposited CdSe and CdS thin films

2002· article· en· W2170700498 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThin-film transistorThreshold voltageSubthreshold slopeMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsSubthreshold conductionTransistorField effectThin filmChemical bath depositionElectron mobilitySemiconductorVoltageAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Layer (electronics)Electrical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryBand gap

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors have fabricated the thin-film transistor (TFT) with CdSe and CdS semiconductor thin films, prepared by a low temperature chemical bath deposition (CBD) method, as an active layer. The ON-current values of the CdSe-TFTs and CdS-TFTs at a gate bias of 10 V and a source-drain voltage of 10 V are about 100 /spl mu/A and 5 /spl mu/A, respectively. The OFF-current values of the CdSe-TFTs and CdS-TFTs at the source-drain voltage of 10 V are less than 10 pA. The fabricated CdSe-TFTs exhibited a field effect mobility of 15 cm/sup 2//V-s, threshold voltage of 3.5 V, subthreshold slope of 0.5 V/dec., and ON/OFF current ratios exceed 10/sup 7/. A field effect mobility of I cm/sup 2//V-s, a threshold voltage of 2.6 V, a subthreshold slope of 0.6 V/dec., and an ON/OFF current ratios exceed 10/sup 6/ were observed for CdS TFTs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it