Composition en profondeur, mobilité et montage dans Cabiria (Pastrone, 1914)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une étude comparative du film Cabiria et de ses chutes (prises de vues exclues de son montage définitif) permet de montrer comment la mise en scène de ce film italien, sorti en 1914, est fondée sur une forme de composition spatiale en profondeur. D'où la tendance notable d'y éviter la fragmentation de l'espace via le montage, comme pour en respecter l'intégrité et mettre en valeur son aspect tridimensionnel. À l'image de la majorité des films européens de la première moitié des années dix, Cabiria réalise ainsi un idéal de représentation spatiale tridimensionnelle « à circularité limitée » qui, tout en permettant au spectateur de se rapprocher de la scène, ne situe jamais l'instance spectatorielle au centre de l'action, un idéal de représentation spatiale au sein de laquelle la mobilité de l'espace scénique est obtenue autrement que par le changement de plan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".