MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170724685 · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-08-0402

Calcineurin A–Binding Protein, a Novel Modulator of the Calcineurin-Nuclear Factor of Activated T-Cell Signaling Pathway, Is Overexpressed in Wilms' Tumors and Promotes Cell Migration

2009· article· en· W2170724685 on OpenAlexaff
Alana H.T. Nguyen, Mélanie Béland, Yaned Gaitan, Maxime Bouchard

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalcineurinCancer researchWilms' tumorCellSignal transductionCell biologyBiologyMedicineTransplantationInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current therapeutic strategies against Wilms' tumor (WT) reach 80% to 85% success rate. In spite of this, a remaining 15% to 20% of tumors relapse and are associated with increased metastasis and poor prognosis. To identify new regulators of WT progression, we screened for developmental target genes of Pax2, a key regulator of kidney development and a WT signature gene. We show that one of these target genes, calcineurin A-binding protein (CnABP), is coexpressed with Pax2 during kidney development and is overexpressed in >70% of WT samples analyzed. The CnABP gene encodes a novel protein product conserved in higher vertebrates. We show that CnABP promotes cell proliferation and migration in cell culture experiments. Biochemical analyses additionally identified an interaction between CnABP and calcineurin Abeta, the catalytic subunit of the calcium-responsive serine/threonine phosphatase calcineurin. We show that this interaction leads to the inhibition of calcineurin phosphatase activity and prevents nuclear factor of activated T-cell (NFAT) nuclear translocation. Inhibition of NFAT nuclear localization results in decreased NFAT transcriptional response. Together, these data identify a new modulator of calcineurin signaling up-regulated in WTs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207