MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170761331 · doi:10.4172/2329-8847.1000113

Centrosome Dysfunction and Senescence: Coincidence or Causality?

2013· article· en· W2170761331 on OpenAlexafffund
William Y. Tsang Delowar Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aging Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research InstituteMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsCentrosomeSenescenceCausality (physics)CoincidenceOmicsBiologyBioinformaticsMedicinePhysiologyComputational biologyCell biologyNeurosciencePathologyGeneticsPhysicsCancerCell cycleAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review Centrosome structure and functionAlthough originally discovered and described by Flemming, Van Beneden and Boveri in the late 1800s as a tiny cellular organelle, the centrosome is a remarkably complex structure with diverse functions [1][2][3][4].It is composed of a pair centrioles surrounded by an amorphous cloud of proteins called the pericentriolar matrix (PCM) (Figure 1).Each centriole is made up of nine triplet of stabilized microtubules arranged in a cylindrical manner.The two centrioles are termed the mother and daughter centrioles, and can be distinguished by the presence of sub-distal and distal appendages at the mother centriole.While sub-distal appendages anchor cytoplasmic microtubules, distal appendages are believed to be important for the formation of cilia, cellular antennae possessing motility and/or sensory function [5,6].Centrioles are responsible for organizing the PCM, the major site of microtubule nucleation from which cytoplasmic microtubules emanate and elongate.In addition, there are centriolar satellites, small and granular structures that cluster around the centrosome and participate in microtubule-dependent protein trafficking towards the organelle [7,8].The centrosome coordinates all microtubulerelated functions, including cell division, cell shape, polarity, motility and adhesion.The number of centrosomes within a cell is tightly regulated during the cell cycle (Figure 1).A single centrosome duplicates once in the S phase, and the two centrosomes, once separated, migrate to opposite poles of a cell and establish the bipolar spindle in mitosis.A functional bipolar spindle ensures faithful chromosome segregation, wherein each incipient daughter cell receives one centrosome and a diploid set of chromosomes.Perturbations known to disrupt centrosome structure and function often have deleterious consequences.For instance, abnormal cell division in mitosis can result in genomic instability and aneuploidy which are characteristics of many types of cancer.In other cases, abnormal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aging ScienceSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207