MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170788480 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2011.6064283

A novel winding layout strategy for planar transformer applicable to high frequency high power DC-DC converters

2011· article· en· W2170788480 on OpenAlexaff
Majid Pahlevaninezhad, Pritam Das, Josef Drobnik, Praveen Jain, Alireza Bakhshai, Gerry Moschopoulos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersTransformerElectrical engineeringEMIElectromagnetic interferenceElectronic engineeringCapacitanceVoltageEngineeringPhysicsElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High power isolated full bridge DC/DC converters are used widely in electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid electric vehicles for battery charging purpose. Such DC/DC converters use planar magnetic components to minimize their size and weight and to increase their ability to withstand mechanical vibrations. Typical planar transformers (PT) in DC/DC converters have high inter-turn and inter-layer capacitances that cause them to draw high peak currents, increase voltage overshoot across secondary rectifying devices, and increase leakage current, which causes EMI problems. These key problems of PT restricts increase of switching frequency of DC/DC converters used in EVs, which in prevents designers of such DC/DC converters from decreasing overall size and weight of the converters. This paper proposes a novel winding layout strategy to mitigate the stray capacitance of planar transformers. The effectiveness of the proposed winding strategy is validated by analytical and experimental results that are presented in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207