MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170798895 · doi:10.1021/pr900767j

Analysis of the Subcellular Phosphoproteome Using a Novel Phosphoproteomic Reactor

2010· article· en· W2170798895 on OpenAlexaff
Houjiang Zhou, Fred Elisma, Nicholas J. Denis, Theodore G. Wright, Ruijun Tian, Hu Zhou, Weimin Hou, Hanfa Zou, Daniel Figeys

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphoproteomicsPhosphopeptidePhosphorylationSubcellular localizationOrganelleProtein phosphorylationProteomicsProtein subcellular localization predictionProteomeCell biologyBiologyBiochemistryChemistryComputational biologyCytoplasmProtein kinase A

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein phosphorylation is an important post-translational modification involved in the regulation of many cellular processes. Mass spectrometry has been successfully used to identify protein phosphorylation in specific pathways and for global phosphoproteomic analysis. However, phosphoproteomics approaches do not evaluate the subcellular localization of the phosphorylated forms of proteins, which is an important factor for understanding the roles of protein phosphorylation on a global scale. The in-depth mapping of protein phosphorylation at the subcellular level necessitates the development of new methods capable of specifically and efficiently enriching phosphopeptides from highly complex samples. Here, we report a novel microfluidic device called the phosphoproteomic reactor that combines efficient processing of proteins followed by phosphopeptide enrichment by Ti-IMAC. To illustrate the potential of this novel technology, we mapped the phosphoproteins in subcellular organelles of liver cells. Fifteen subcellular fractions from liver cell cultures were processed on the phosphoproteomic reactor in combination with nano-LC-MS/MS analysis. We identified thousands of phosphorylation sites in over 600 phosphoproteins in different organelles using minute amounts of starting material. Overall, this approach provides a new avenue for studying the phosphoproteome of the subcellular organelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207