MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170803025 · doi:10.1109/tec.2011.2160545

Design and Analysis of an Electromechanical Battery for Rural Electrification in Sub-Saharan Africa

2011· article· en· W2170803025 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Okou, A.B. Sebitosi, Azeem Khan, Paul Barendse, Pragasen Pillay

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlywheelRotor (electric)Automotive engineeringBattery (electricity)EngineeringElectrificationEnergy storageMechanical engineeringMaterials sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineeringElectricity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design and analysis of an electromechanical flywheel energy storage system to enhance rural electrification in sub-Saharan Africa. The system consists of a flywheel rotor, an electrical machine, control system, bearings, and a containment structure. With the exception of the power electronics and magnets, local materials were used for the manufacture of the flywheel system. The flywheel rotor is made from glass fiber-epoxy composite, designed using novel shape profiles and utilizes a stress based solution by introducing a central hole for shaft inclusion. The system was accelerated to 6000 r/min storing up to 227 kJ. Numerical stress analyses were performed during the design stage to ensure that the maximum tensile strength is not exceeded. A lumped parameter thermal model is used to estimate the temperature distribution to ensure safe operating conditions of the flywheel system and environment. A life cycle cost analysis performed found that by integrating a flywheel system into a Solar Home System implies a cost savings of 35% per kilowatthour when compared with lead-acid batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207