Postnatal Gender-dependent Maturation of Cellular Cysteine Uptake
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In view of the functional capacity of glutathione synthesis in premature infants, and because the availability of cysteine is one the rate limiting steps in glutathione synthesis, we hypothesized that the low glutathione levels in premature infants may be due to immaturity of the active cellular uptake of cysteine. OBJECTIVE: To document in cells from newborn infants the effect of maturity and gender on cysteine uptake and consequently on glutathione levels. METHODS: Incorporation of L-[35S] cysteine was measured in leukocytes from cord blood and from tracheal aspirates (TAC) of newborn infants of varying (gestational as well as postnatal) ages and gender. Cysteine uptake was correlated with glutathione in TAC. RESULTS: The maturity of newborn girls positively influences cysteine uptake, which is responsible for 78% of the variation in their glutathione content. However, in newborn boys, gestational and postnatal ages did not influence the cysteine uptake. DISCUSSION: Cysteine uptake appears to be the limiting step explaining the reported gender-related differences in glutathione as well as the low levels of this central antioxidant found in premature infants. The immature cysteine uptake found in cells from premature infants raises questions about the bioavailability of this conditionally essential amino acid in regimens of parenteral nutrition for human neonates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it