MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170811207 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2009.5425428

TCP Based Estimation Method for Loss Control in OBS Networks

2009· article· en· W2170811207 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Faten Zhani, Halima Elbiaze, Wael Hosny Fouad Aly

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical burst switchingComputer scienceOffset (computer science)The InternetEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionReal-time computingNode (physics)Control (management)Computer networkOptical performance monitoringEngineeringTelecommunicationsWavelength-division multiplexingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical Burst Switching (OBS) has been developed as an efficient switching technique for the next generation optical Internet. A critical issue for OBS networks is the burst loss which could occur due to contention and/or insufficient offset time. Burst Loss Ratio (BLR) is used as the main performance parameter in bufferless OBS networks. This paper proposes a new TCP statistics based method to predict the BLR without using any feedback information from the network. The idea is to estimate the BLR based on the TCP statistics available at the edge node. Our proposed BLR prediction method is then integrated into the closed loop feedback control model to control the BLR inside the network. Our simulation results clearly show that our proposed method improves the efficiency of the closed loop feedback control model while avoiding the use of any feedback information from the network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207