MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170859731 · doi:10.1139/l05-116

Nonorthogonal solution for thin-walled members – a finite element formulation

2006· article· en· W2170859731 on OpenAlex
R. Emre Erkmen, Magdi Mohareb

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsFinite element methodImage warpingCoordinate systemMixed finite element methodBeam (structure)StiffnessDisplacement fieldField (mathematics)MathematicsMathematical analysisTimoshenko beam theoryStructural engineeringGeometryComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional solutions for the equations of equilibrium based on the well-known Vlasov thin-walled beam theory uncouple the equations by adopting orthogonal coordinate systems. Although this technique considerably simplifies the resulting field equations, it introduces several modelling complications and limitations. As a result, in the analysis of problems where eccentric supports or abrupt cross-sectional changes exist (in elements with rectangular holes, coped flanges, or longitudinal stiffened members, etc.), the Vlasov theory has been avoided in favour of a shell finite element that offer modelling flexibility at higher computational cost. In this paper, a general solution of the Vlasov thin-walled beam theory based on a nonorthogonal coordinate system is developed. The field equations are then exactly solved and the resulting displacement field expressions are used to formulate a finite element. Two additional finite elements are subsequently derived to cover the special cases where (a) the St.Venant torsional stiffness is negligible and (b) the warping torsional stiffness is negligible. Key words: open sections, warping effect, finite element,thin-walled beams, asymmetric sections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it