MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Behavior of Cold Bend Pipes under Bending Loads

2010· article· en· W2170903562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaTransCanada (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBucklingBendingStructural engineeringDeformation (meteorology)Materials scienceInternal pressureCompression (physics)Cold formingPure bendingComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ground movement along a buried pipeline often places the line in net compression. The local buckling resistance at cold bends is less than at straight sections, and hence, local buckling tends to occur at bends. Correspondingly, this full-scale testing program was conducted to investigate the local and global load-deformation relationships for seven cold bend pipes under applied loads. The specimens were loaded under bending, axial load, and internal pressure until local buckling occurred, and their curvatures were subsequently increased to establish their postbuckling behaviors. It was demonstrated though these tests that the buckling strain of the cold bend pipes was considerably lower than a straight pipe and that the presence of internal pressure exhibited a predominant role on the specimens load-deformation behaviors. It was also established that the behavior of the specimens was relatively unaffected by the bending methods that were employed during cold bending.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it