MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170913211 · doi:10.1017/s1755691009007038

Geochemical investigation of an unusual alteration profile developed at the base of a Carboniferous lava flow, Isle of Bute, Scotland

2008· article· en· W2170913211 on OpenAlexaff
Grant M. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLavaIgneous rockGeologyWeatheringGeochemistryCarboniferousVolcanic rockSedimentary rockVolcanoMaficRare earthMineralogyPetrologyGeomorphologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT An alteration zone at the base of a Carboniferous lava flow on the island of Bute resembles modern and ancient weathering profiles, but it is ‘upside down’ in the sense that alteration is most intense at the base and decreases upwards. Values for a Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) increase from fresh lava and corestones downwards to fine-grained structureless material. The altered material is Mg- and Cu-rich, possibly as a result of migration of these elements from underlying sediments. Rare earth elements (REE) display considerable and systematic mobility and fractionation. In general heavy rare earth elements (HREE) are concentrated during alteration, whereas the light rare earth elements (LREE) are lost. Mobility of the REE appears to be related to atomic weight, with La (the lightest REE) being the most depleted through to Lu, which is the most concentrated REE in the highly altered material. Similar systematic fractionation is shown by some weathering profiles developed on mafic igneous rocks. Movement of water into the volcanic rocks was probably driven by a steep thermal gradient between the hot lava and its sedimentary substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of EdinburghSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207