Estimating spatial distribution of Atlantic salmon escapement using redd counts despite changes over time in counting procedure: application to the Allier River population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In salmonid species, such as Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar L.), the most frequent type of data set available related to adult escapements are redd counts. When collected over a broad spatio‐temporal domain, redd counts data are of great interest for tracking the variation through time of the spatial distribution of the potential spawners. This is important for management purposes when the habitat quality is variable across river sections of a catchment or when the spatial distribution can vary depending on management actions or on environmental factors. However, long‐term data sets are prone to changes in data collection methodology. In this article, we present a new hierarchical Bayesian modelling approach that allows both (i) to account for a change in the data collection procedure and (ii) to analyse the variation through time of the potential spawners’ spatial distribution. The value of the proposed approach is demonstrated by its application to the Atlantic salmon redd counts data collected in Allier (France) catchment from 1977 to 2011. The Allier can be divided into three main sections according to management and habitat considerations, and an important change occurred in the redd data collection in 1997: counts by foot or by boat were replaced by counts from a helicopter. A significant effect of this change on methodology is detected: less redds counted when using the helicopter counts. However, its explicit consideration in the modelling makes little difference with regard to the estimates of potential spawner abundance and their associated uncertainty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".