MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170926501 · doi:10.3141/1985-19

Incorporating Within-Household Interactions into Mode Choice Model with Genetic Algorithm for Parameter Estimation

2006· article· en· W2170926501 on OpenAlex
Matthew J. Roorda, Eric L. Miller, Nicolas Kruchten

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicKorean Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimationGenetic algorithmMode (computer interface)Mode choiceAlgorithmComputer scienceEstimation theoryEconometricsMathematical optimizationEngineeringTransport engineeringMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The procedure for estimating a household model of mode choice is described. The tour-based mode choice model incorporates interpersonal interactions within the household explicitly in an agent-based random utility modeling framework. Household interactions include vehicle allocation, ridesharing to joint activities, and drop-off and pickup. Because of the complex nature of the model decision structure, choice probabilities are simulated from direct generation of random utilities rather than through an analytical probability expression. The computational requirements for the simulation are large. Therefore a grid of computers is used in parallel to perform the necessary calculations and a genetic algorithm is used for parameter estimation. A brief description of the model, the full model results, and a discussion of the computational techniques used in parameter estimation are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it